This strongly suggests He did not consider the books of the Apocrypha as part of Old Testament Scripture as with the books from Genesis to 2 Chronicles. It can be found on YouTube and free to download. Thank you very much for your time! For 1500+ years, these books were considered sacred, then all of a sudden a bunch of people rock up and think they know better. Hello writer, The reformation was not a simple black and white line. > Why did the Protestants delete some books from the Catholic Bible? Thank you for developing this site! If one rejects Text X, then it logically follows that every subsequent work which sources Text X as if nothing is wrong should also be questioned if not rejected. Desidrius Erasmus was a 2. Conclusion: Some people are just snobs who want to be different and would make up some pseudo-academic excuse to back it up. In addition, most Scripture scholars believe that 1 Maccabees, Judith, Baruch and parts of Wisdom were also originally written in Hebrew.) God has given me the talent to write and I want to The site uses Adobie Flash so you will cannot open it in Apple products. JP II Center in Kraków, Divine Mercy Center for the Decade and Mass, Tour of Krakòw. You’re an inspiration to many people. You to it here! There seems to be a lot of misinformation being taught to today's Protestants: including the idea that Catholics "added" books to the Bible. Answer The canon of the Catholic Bible was established before the canon of the Hebrew Bible was known, and included a number of Old Testament books, … Luther in 1534 thought Baruch was “too skimpy” and not lofty enough to be from the scribe of Jeremiah. Hey Joe Jersey check out Youversion Bible app. The last 14 books that made up the end of the Old Testament were as follows: 1 Esdras 2 The Old Testament books … Wouldn’t we both agree these three are apocrypha? This list, as accepted by the Catholic Church, was affirmed by the Council of Hippo in 393 A.D., by the Council of Carthage in 397 A.D., and by Pope Innocent I in 405 A.D. At the Ecumenical Council of Florence in 1442, the Catholic list was again restated, against those who wanted to include even more books. In the year 1611 the Holy Bible was translated from Latin to English; and at that time the Bible contained a total of 80 books. For Catholics it is not a matter of scoring but a matter of authority. Care was taken not to over- or under-represent sources of inclusion or exclusion, especially in cases where information is not complete (i.e. See what you will gain if you pray the Holy Rosary today. Why Did Martin Luther Remove 7 Books From The Bible? These were the last books of the Old Testament written, composed in the last two centuries B.C. Thank you again for this incredible website! While other replies have fully listed Luther’s beliefs and situations, I really Why Protestants should care about the Pope First Thanksgiving was Catholic Sebastian alleges no Catholic Church in history. jomafro.tumblr.com. I call these explanations "myths" because they are either incorrect or simply inadequate reasons for rejecting these books They did this at the Council of Jamnia (about 100 A.D.), at which they rejected the seven Deuterocanonical books because they believed that they were not written in Hebrew. In his best-selling novel, "The Da Vinci Code," Dan Brown wrote that the Bible was assembled during the famous Council of Nicea in 325 C.E., when Emperor Constantine and church authorities purportedly banned problematic books that didn't conform to their secret agenda. Later in the debate, Luther appealed to St. Jerome for rejecting Maccabees (the councils of Carthage, Hippo, and Florence all included Macabees as canonical Scripture). May God Bless you and your endeavors. During Confession a few months ago, the priest and I ended up discussing the different orders in which a person might read the Bible as opposed to Genesis to Apocalypse. Joe, I am sorry but I don’t know of one off the top of my head, but I think if you search Google for “Catholic Bible on line” I think you will find plenty. Well, let’s examine the logical consistency because consistency reveals/betrays one’s stupidity, or worse, dishonesty. It is most helpful. Finally, in 1546, the Council of Trent reaffirmed the traditional list of the Catholic Church. Frank, that is a very interesting site you’ve assembled. A Protestant Bible is a Christian Bible whose translation or revision was produced by Protestants.Such Bibles comprise 39 books of the Old Testament (according to the Hebrew Bible canon, known especially to non-Protestants as the protocanonical books) and 27 books of the New Testament for a total of 66 books… I’m sure I can find out how to reach them online. An answer to a Catholic friend about why the so called apocrypha was removed from the Bible On this page I am attempting to answer a question - this is what we do in the Feedback section of CH101. All Rights Reserved. This means that Jerome’s idea of “Hebrew truth” (I.e., only that which is found in the Hebrew MT is true) has been demonstrated to be an error. What Jerome could not have known was that there were many different Hebrew manuscripts in circulation during the first century and that the Greek Septuagint, a translation made by the Jews around 200 BC, at least in parts, appears to be a very literal translation of a more ancient Hebrew text tradition that is now lost. Do you know of a good searchable on line bible that contains all the books that protestant omit? This is an excellent short answer. I have two questions I hope you can help me with. To understand the question, and the answer, it The priest himself found it so helpful that he recommends the book to all his parishioners. Why did Protestants remove books from the Bible? One thing that might be of interest are the dates when the books of scripture were divided into chapters and then, later, when the individual verses were determined and assigned numbers. I understand since you don’t write articles for print you aren’t familiar with that so I will continue to do research on that- no problem. I love it. use it to write articles promoting and defending the Catholic faith. Why did the Vatican remove 14 secret books from the Bible in 1684? Lv 7 1 decade ago Favourite answer They were following the Jews. Jan 13, 2010 Updated Nov 2015 Is The Apocrypha Inspired? Why do the Protestants Reject The Apocrypha? Kindly research into the quest of Dan; and please, send me a copy. I don’t know when these events occurred, but I believe I read that the chapters and verses were determined by monks as they copied the scriptures. Books are either Holy Scripture or not; this is the way it’s been since He told Moses to write the first Scriptures. Protestants offer various explanations to explain why they reject the deuterocanonical books as Scripture. The version of the Bible in use at the time of Jesus was the Septuagint (abbreviated LXX, for the 70 men who translated it from Hebrew into Greek by the beginning of the first century B.C.). So why then does everyone continue to call him Jesus, when the letter J did not even being used at the time? Catholics erred first, diverting from apostolic and church tradition, when they pronounced the deuterocanon inspired by God and suitable for doctrine. I wish to write articles about faith in this modern age within a sociological, psychological, and philosophical framework, as well as how political climates come into play and finally, to show readers what tradition and authority really mean, I hope to do this by, among many other things, making relevant again Pope Pius XII’s encyclical “Humani Generis,” It is a tremendous help to Catholics like me. Bruce’s “The Canon of Scripture.”* Are there any (other) sources you can recommend on the history of Sacred Scripture? I apologize for the late response - I had to pull out John Piper and Jonathan Edwards to get the full backstory on this particular question (See ending sources). Seven books of the Bible, all in the Old Testament, are accepted by Roman Catholics and Eastern Orthodox, but are not accepted by Jews or Protestants. (Joshua 1:7-8, Numbers 33:2). I enjoy finding short posts like these, although I know it’s challenging to do theology posts in less than 400 words. (The word “Bible” means “the Book.”) The earliest writings of the Bible were likely composed in the 10th century B.C. A List of Approved Catholic Translations, The 15 Promises Of The Blessed Virgin Mary To Catholics Who Devoutly Pray The Rosary Daily, Rosary Of Liberation: For Deliverance, Healing & Breakthrough. He did say that Wisdom, Sirach, Judith, and Tobit (books accepted by Cathodox, rejected by Protestants) were "not included in the canon, but appointed by the Church … These include 1 st and 2 nd Maccabees, Judith, Tobit, Baruch, Sirach, and Wisdom, and additions to the books of Esther and Daniel. These include 1 and 2 Maccabees , Judith , Tobit , Baruch, Sirach, and Wisdom, and additions to the books of Esther and Daniel. Why did the Church accept the other books Protestants call apocrypha STEVE RAY HERE: Thank you and God bless you! From then on, Luther (and all Protestants) have been trying to justify this removal. (In 1947, however, fragments in Hebrew of Tobit and Sirach were discovered among the Dead Sea Scrolls. For the majority of my career I’ve been a Writer/Editor. Defenders of the Catholic Faith | Hosted by Stephen K. Ray. But in the long run, it really came down to Jerome’s rejection. fragmented codexes) or when an author lists a book (i.e. 1. Discussion in 'General Theology' started by SecretOfFatima, Jun 3, 2008. https://drive.google.com/open?id=1rFKBCDu7ob6QidUbioA5lhVS_GVf480yBxczNQkEj5A, https://drive.google.com/open?id=1xVzqAjGgixbxrQy5X1On8BhvhKeFhUnm. My scoring methodology awards +2 points when a source affirms the canonicity of one of the deuterocanon, -2 points for explicitly excluding the deuterocanon, and -1 point when a book is excluded by absentia (an implied exclusion based on the assumption that they left it off the explicit list for a reason). Thank you. Thanks and I will but I meant apart from that book. The writing of Scripture continued until the first century A.D., when Revelation was complete. My question to you is- Where? Due to health reasons, I am unable to work but on good days I’m able to write, as long as there is no time restriction. I do appreciate you getting back to me and I definitely didn’t want to waste your time about which magazines to submit things to- I can research that, I just thought if you had experience with any magazines you could recommend them. They have many bibles and multiple catholic versions for free. No, the Catholics did not add these books to the canon during the Reformation. I recommend the Douey Rheims Holy Bible. { 19 comments… read them below or add one }. They just assigned a different status to some of the books. By appealing to Jerome, he also rejected all the other books Jerome rejected (Wisdom, Sirach, Baruch, Tobit, Judith, 1st and 2nd Maccabees, Daniel 13, and sections of Esther). He did this for doctrinal reasons (for example: 2 Maccabees 12:43-46 supports the doctrine of purgatory, Hebrews supports the existence of the priesthood, and James 2:24 supports the Catholic doctrine on merit). Seven books of the Bible, all in the Old Testament, are accepted by Roman Catholics and Eastern Orthodox, but are not accepted by Jews or Protestants. Without the authority of the Catholic Church, how does a Protestant know which books belong in the New Testament? Thanks for this! The early Church did not require all Scripture to be written in Hebrew, and the New Testament books were written in Greek. I developed this site to highlight a few key points about the development of the canon. There Was More Testimony From Jesus Jesus gave further testimony of the extent of the Old Testament canon in the day of His resurrection. Why did Protestants remove books from the Bible? I’ve been having a discussion with a Mormon, who seems to think that Catholics took books out of the Bible! For example 1 & 2 Maccabees were written after Previous post: Walking in the Footprints of St. Pope John Paul II’s Childhood and much more! Uh… I think you must be referring to the publication of the (English) Revised version (1881–1885), although that didn’t “remove” books from the Bible. I needed an answer, and you have given it. One of these books that is particularly interesting, is the “Wisdom of Solomon”. A look at Christian and secular history obviously reveals the opposite. Since the Deuteros were not part of the MT, he rejected them as not being of the canonical Scripture. Please check out Gary Michuta’s book “Why Catholic Bibles are Bigger”. This version of the Bible included the seven Deuterocanonical books. I don’t know why God commanded it this way, but that’s what He did. I too need to get this book! Seven books of the Bible, all in the Old Testament, are accepted by Roman Catholics and Eastern Orthodox, but are not accepted by Jews or Protestants. Reformed theologian R. C. Sproul honestly admits that the Protestant position can at best claim “a fallible collection of infallible books” (Essential Truths of the Christian Faith [Wheaton, Ill.: Tyndale House, 1992], 22). Seven books of the Bible, all in the Old Testament, are accepted by Roman Catholics and Eastern Orthodox, but are not accepted by Jews or Protestants. This chart https://drive.google.com/open?id=1rFKBCDu7ob6QidUbioA5lhVS_GVf480yBxczNQkEj5A is a representation and interpretation, "in sum," of the information that I have compiled in this infographic https://drive.google.com/open?id=1xVzqAjGgixbxrQy5X1On8BhvhKeFhUnm which I created ©2018 after much reading, particularly of F.F. My position, based on the research presented here, is thus: both Protestant and Catholic Christians erred by adopting extreme positions relative to each other, spurred by the tension of the Counter-/Reformation. Their omission in Protestant Bibles leaves a chronological gap in salvation history. Walking in the Footprints of St. Pope John Paul II’s Childhood and much more! The early Church continued to accept the books of the LXX version, although some debate about these books continued through the 5th century. Nothing is more important to me than my faith. Thank you for your suggestion to contact the Augustine Institute. https://www.catholicconvert.com/blog/2018/05/23/sola-scriptura-and-the-canon-of-scripture/, https://www.catholicconvert.com/resources/michuta-vs-white-debate/. I have just discovered your site — I’m very impressed with the size as well as the scope of information. The priest suggested I read a book which promotes a specific order in which to read and explains why it helps people better understand it, historical and other contexts I’m guessing. *A note about the chart and infographic: it is not meant to absolutely prove anything, but is useful to summarize and provide context for the conclusion I outline above.